Showing posts with label 2019. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2019. Show all posts

Hope Not Hate

This is one of those blogs, one hopes never to write, but given the events of the last weeks, it seems unavoidable. 

What unfolded in New Zealand is heart breaking, but expected - sooner or later. What one didn't expect, was that it would be New Zealand, to put it bluntly, given the that a number of Australian politicians (and parties) in Australia have been using intolerance, hate and fear as political currency for around two decades; Australia seemed the more likely scenario. And indeed, this did turn out to be an Australian white supremacist, fueled by hate and made brave by Australian politicians normalising. 

What followed in Australia, should be of concern to all -of gigantic proportions.  The comments made by one Australian Federal Senator (voted in by a whopping 19 votes), in particular were, and continue to be...... actually, there are no words to describe the repulsion of this individual, nor the media outlets which continue to allow others like him to continue spin their bile message directly to a mass audience. The fact that, the ACMA (Australian Communications and Media Authority) have not revoked their licenses is truly incompetent and illustrates all to clearly the failings in legislation. 

Lets be absolutely clear - HATE SPEECH, IS NOT FREE SPEECH - IT IS HATE SPEECH. Free speech stops the moment it creates a dangerous 'Us verses Them' narrative. 74 years after the conclusion of WW2, it appears humans are too stupid to learn.


As Labor Party Leader, Bill Shorten made clear, after 50 innocent people (including children) were confirmed dead and another 12 rushed to intensive care as result of the Christchurch terrorist attack, on the 15th March 2019;

Hate speech, doesn't always lead to violence; but violence ALWAYS starts with hate speech. 

The entire history of humanity, into the present day, already provides far too many examples of exactly this.  

Regardless of the ideology on which hate speech is based, it is at its core utterly repugnant and pure evil. 

The election of Mark Latham into the Parliament of New South Wales, over the weekend - should not just raise warnings, as to how normalised hate speech masquerading as free speech has become, but also place Australian anti-terror organisations and Police services on greater vigilance, increase watch lists - if not raise their internal alert levels - considerably. Because if the patterns illustrated here continue the slaughter of Australians; regardless of religion, race, gender, age, sexual orientation will escalate, with any and all Australians becoming targets. 

So where does the responsibility rest? 

It rests with each and every individual. It rests with us: 

  • report hate speech when we hear and/or see it. 
  • report hate speech and content on social media, to that social media provider and to not share, re-post or retweet that content. 
  • write, phone, email, twitter, facebook - every politician and party you can think of; demanding Australian Media Ownership Restrictions to be re-introduced - Immediately. 
But most importantly it rests with us, at the ballot box !  
At any and every occasion, 
Vote:  #HopeNotHateForAustralia
Vote: Compassion, Tolerance - Humanity.

Links: 

This first one, should be screaming from Australia's media - but instead...... *crickets*

     

 

 

 

 


Your Questions Answered: Rowing Precinct Development.

Hello all, 

This is just a very quick Blog, on the Rowing Precinct development on North Bank, Lindsay Street, Inveresk( Launceston).

This posting is in direct response to those who've asked me questions regarding previous postings on this particular subject (and will be the last for quite a while) on this subject. I'd also like to make clear, that  North Esk Rowing Club were not aware of this particular post, at the time of it going live. 

The question I am repeatedly being asked is:  

Where would I propose putting the Launceston Rowing Precinct.

That's very simple. 

On the South Bank opposite the North Esk Rowing Club are 2 pontoons, with a long building behind it. 

This particular building and pontoons were developed and purpose built to house rowing clubs. I was built in such away that it could house - 1 or 2 rowing clubs, depending on what was required at the time. 

For some time UTAS (in Launceston it was / is UTLBC) were, some years ago, boating from one end. Until UTAS shut the club down. 

Yes. It is THAT simple. The buildings, the pontoons etc already exist. 
So pray tell, why build more, when those have are not being used for the purpose they were created? 

This current situation, the build for a new rowing precinct is nothing more than empire building and a money grab from rate payer / tax payer coffers. 

Instead, why not have an enormous green space, perhaps with fitness equipment etc , for all Launceston and visitors to enjoy? 

Any politician, or political party considering pork barrelling the proposed Rowing Precinct on the North Bank at Inveresk - has rocks in their heads and is quite happy to through money at a project which is completely wasteful, superfluous and unnecessary. 

Why replace something which already exists and is not being used for the purpose for which it was built?

As I've said, this posting is just an answer to a question I've been repeatedly asked of late. And its my intention that it will be my last blog post, concerning the Rowing Precinct at Inveresk - at least for a while. 

Many thanks for your time and efforts, in looking at and considering the bigger picture, and alternatives. 


State of Rowing in Tasmania

"Oarsome Rowing Precinct for Tamar”: Is it best really for the sport?
 
Yesterday The Examiner newspaper ran a puff piece and an online editorial on the Launceston City Council's establishment of a rowing precinct at Inveresk. 

The precinct itself had been on the table since the early 2000s, however, the most recent developments are cause for concern and raise more questions than they answer none of which, this writer has received adequate - or in some cases ANY answers to.

I am also fully aware that in writing this blog Rowing Tasmania may come after me, mine and / or North Esk Rowing Club for placing these questions in the public domain. As may Launceston City Council.  

Perhaps the Tasmanian Minister for Sport & Recreation (Premier) Will Hodgman, Rowing Australia and the City of Launceston could answer them, as no one else seems willing to, or perhaps able to. 

How is this going to function when it comes to the pontoon? When the North Esk Rowing Club (NERC) (including North Esk Dragon Boats) and St Patrick's College already have the pontoon running at capacity?

North Esk Rowing Club have been paying for the insurance and repairs of the NERC for the pontoon since it was originally put in position more than 11 years ago. The pontoon having been supplied by a private benefactor. 

After the 2016 flood, NERC spent more than $50k on pontoon repairs. Post flood repairs, NERC were approached by the Launceston City Council and the private benefactor, to discuss the option of adding a second pontoon. NERC chose to take this option, as the pontoon use had already outgrown the pontoon. At no time were NERC (nor St Patrick's College) informed that the pontoon would be shared between themselves AND the entire rowing precinct.

Given this pontoon already runs at capacity, adding extra clubs and organisations to the existing share arrangements may very well be dangerous. So where are the risk assessment reports etc. from Rowing Tasmania and Launceston City Council? 

Will Rowing Tasmania, who have been given control of the precinct (I'll come back to this at a later date) be reimbursing NERC for their $50k+ or will they remove NERC's half at Rowing Tasmania cost and place at the rear access of the NERC's boat sheds, for NERC's exclusive use?

As to the costs of running Rowing Tasmania's head quarters within this rowing precinct, what is this going to cost the Tasmanian rowing community? 

Seat fees are already $14 per crew member, per race. Then add club membership fees, travel, uniforms and compulsory Rowing Tasmania membership. People are already being priced out of the sport and volunteers are dropping away rapidly. 

For almost 50years North Esk Rowing Club has fostered and supported disabled rowing, teenagers from Govt schools and disadvantaged youngsters wanting to row. These are the people most affected by expensive seat fees. All of which has largely been done without any financial or other support from Rowing Tasmania itself, and I've no knowledge of Rowing Tasmania assisting other clubs in these areas.

Serious questions really need to be addressed. As fees increase and costs force rowers out of the sport and volunteers; including coaches, drop away rapidly... are Rowing Tasmania, Launceston City Council and the Tasmanian Liberal Govt. really working in the best interests of rowing, or primarily in the interests of their own political (and other) agendas? 

When all of these elements are put in context it is simply not going to be sustainable for Launceston to have 3 rowing clubs. Where are the rowers and coaches going to come from, the private schools? It's already known that it is difficult to retain these youngsters once they finish school and the private schools state wide are struggling to find experienced coaches. 

Is it realistic to believe that Scotch Oakburn College and Launceston Church Grammar School are really going to give up the independence of their own boat sheds, boat parks and pontoons / ramps, to move to a site managed by Rowing Tasmania, rather than a consortium of all stake holders with equal rights and votes? If North Esk Rowing Club had been aware of this new dynamic prior to their move, one doubts that such a move would ever have been agreed to and NERC would remain on the original site and conditions of their original 99year+ lease with the Crown.

One last thing before signing off. It is almost impossible for clubs within Tasmania to make Rowing Tasmania accountable or questioned, not due to the Rowing Tasmania 'Incorporated Constitution.' that is a rather simple document... no, the problem is the 11 PAGES of By Laws ! and the day to day functionality of the system / organisational structure itself.

Perhaps it's time rowing clubs around Tasmania re-estanblished the NTRA* and STRA**. There is absolutely no doubt that Rowing Tasmania would fight such a move tooth and nail, but perhaps this will be the only way to save rowing, rowing clubs and provide Tasmanian rowers with affordable racing through locally run regattas.
   

*Northern Tasmanian Rowing Association. (NTRA)
**Southern Tasmanian Rowing Association. (STRA)

PS. 
There is a Launceston City Council election due at the end of this year AND a Federal Election early 2019 - just saying.......

Follow up blog on this issue 11th Sept 2018: 

Blogs by Concerned Citizen Advocacy Groups (Launceston):



Australian Agriculture & Potential impact of Trumpian politics.

Australian Agriculture & Potential impact of Trump politics.  It's been a while, but it's time to start blogging again. If only ...